Contributions de l’utilisateur

De Formationformateur.

(toute dernière | toute première) Voir (50 plus récentes) (50 plus anciennes) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).

• 29 février 2012 à 07:22 (hist) (diff) Discuter:Accueil‎ (→Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is : nouvelle section)
• 29 février 2012 à 07:13 (hist) (diff) Discuter:Accueil‎ (In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create)
• 29 février 2012 à 07:06 (hist) (diff) Discussion Formationformateur:Accueil‎ (I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo)
• 29 février 2012 à 06:54 (hist) (diff) Discussion Formationformateur:Accueil‎ (Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i)
• 29 février 2012 à 06:50 (hist) (diff) Discuter:Accueil‎ (→Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in : nouvelle section)
• 29 février 2012 à 06:42 (hist) (diff) Discuter:Accueil‎ (What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT)
• 29 février 2012 à 06:34 (hist) (diff) Discussion Formationformateur:Accueil‎ (The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only)
• 29 février 2012 à 06:23 (hist) (diff) Discussion Formationformateur:Accueil‎ (Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i)
• 29 février 2012 à 06:19 (hist) (diff) Discuter:Accueil‎ (→The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only : nouvelle section)
• 29 février 2012 à 05:52 (hist) (diff) Discussion Formationformateur:Accueil‎ (One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v)
• 29 février 2012 à 05:47 (hist) (diff) Discuter:Accueil‎ (→And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is : nouvelle section)
• 29 février 2012 à 05:38 (hist) (diff) Discuter:Accueil‎ (Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast)
• 29 février 2012 à 05:31 (hist) (diff) Discussion Formationformateur:Accueil‎ (Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and)
• 29 février 2012 à 05:20 (hist) (diff) Discussion Formationformateur:Accueil‎ (I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom)
• 29 février 2012 à 05:07 (hist) (diff) Discuter:Accueil‎ (That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.)
• 29 février 2012 à 04:59 (hist) (diff) Discussion Formationformateur:Accueil‎ (Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://mnudeqnakedasex.insanejournal.com Amanda)
• 29 février 2012 à 04:47 (hist) (diff) Discussion Formationformateur:Accueil‎ (Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment)
• 29 février 2012 à 04:43 (hist) (diff) Discuter:Accueil‎ (→It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo : nouvelle section)
• 29 février 2012 à 04:34 (hist) (diff) Discuter:Accueil‎ (I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:)
• 29 février 2012 à 04:27 (hist) (diff) Discussion Formationformateur:Accueil‎ (I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie)
• 29 février 2012 à 04:16 (hist) (diff) Discussion Formationformateur:Accueil‎ (That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.)
• 29 février 2012 à 04:12 (hist) (diff) Discuter:Accueil‎ (→Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's : nouvelle section)
• 29 février 2012 à 04:02 (hist) (diff) Discuter:Accueil‎ (Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://kyvonnestrahovskih.freeforums.org Yvonne Strahovski Nude,)
• 29 février 2012 à 03:55 (hist) (diff) Discussion Formationformateur:Accueil‎ (Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast)
• 29 février 2012 à 03:45 (hist) (diff) Discussion Formationformateur:Accueil‎ (That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.)
• 29 février 2012 à 03:41 (hist) (diff) Discuter:Accueil‎ (→Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://inudennakedssex.insanejournal.com Cameron Diaz Porn, >:O, : nouvelle section)
• 29 février 2012 à 03:33 (hist) (diff) Discuter:Accueil‎ (I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://ujuliannamarguliess.f)
• 29 février 2012 à 03:26 (hist) (diff) Discussion Formationformateur:Accueil‎ (In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread)
• 29 février 2012 à 03:10 (hist) (diff) Discuter:Accueil‎ (→Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://ddemilovatonudee.tumblr.com Demi Lovato Nude, 1001, http:/ : nouvelle section)
• 29 février 2012 à 03:01 (hist) (diff) Discuter:Accueil‎ (I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion)
• 29 février 2012 à 02:53 (hist) (diff) Discussion Formationformateur:Accueil‎ (Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://bjennymccarthyi.freeforums.org Jenny Mcca)
• 29 février 2012 à 02:43 (hist) (diff) Discussion Formationformateur:Accueil‎ (It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo)
• 29 février 2012 à 02:38 (hist) (diff) Discuter:Accueil‎ (→One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v : nouvelle section)
• 29 février 2012 à 02:30 (hist) (diff) Discuter:Accueil‎ (I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney)
• 29 février 2012 à 02:22 (hist) (diff) Discussion Formationformateur:Accueil‎ (Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's)
• 29 février 2012 à 02:11 (hist) (diff) Discussion Formationformateur:Accueil‎ (ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug)
• 29 février 2012 à 02:07 (hist) (diff) Discuter:Accueil‎ (→Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://v : nouvelle section)
• 29 février 2012 à 01:59 (hist) (diff) Discuter:Accueil‎ (I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac)
• 29 février 2012 à 01:51 (hist) (diff) Discussion Formationformateur:Accueil‎ (And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is)
• 29 février 2012 à 01:41 (hist) (diff) Discussion Formationformateur:Accueil‎ (In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread)
• 29 février 2012 à 01:36 (hist) (diff) Discuter:Accueil‎ (→Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's : nouvelle section)
• 29 février 2012 à 01:27 (hist) (diff) Discuter:Accueil‎ (Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://mnudennakedisex.insanejournal.com Lucy Pi)
• 29 février 2012 à 01:20 (hist) (diff) Discussion Formationformateur:Accueil‎ (O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://ejamiechungnudeu.tumblr.com Jamie Chung Nude, =-)
• 29 février 2012 à 01:09 (hist) (diff) Discussion Formationformateur:Accueil‎ (The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only)
• 29 février 2012 à 01:05 (hist) (diff) Discuter:Accueil‎ (→One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v : nouvelle section)
• 29 février 2012 à 00:55 (hist) (diff) Discuter:Accueil‎ (I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo)
• 29 février 2012 à 00:48 (hist) (diff) Discussion Formationformateur:Accueil‎ (I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:)
• 29 février 2012 à 00:38 (hist) (diff) Discussion Formationformateur:Accueil‎ (I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as)
• 29 février 2012 à 00:34 (hist) (diff) Discuter:Accueil‎ (→It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange : nouvelle section)
• 29 février 2012 à 00:25 (hist) (diff) Discuter:Accueil‎ (That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.)

(toute dernière | toute première) Voir (50 plus récentes) (50 plus anciennes) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).